2. What two (or more) quotes capture the message of the article?
“China’s first major revision to its 15-year-old air pollution law will do more at the regional level to cut down on smog, but there are glaring omissions, such as a cap on coal use.”
“Several new elements have been added in the revised law, including articles about regional prevention and control of pollution, an alert system that gives warnings on weather conditions that worsen smog, and limits on particular levels of polluting compounds, particularly in vehicle fuels.”
“The new law clarifies the link between air quality and the total emissions of pollutants, and provides a legislative foundation for the 2013 air pollution action plan.”
3. What is the main point of the article, and how is it supported? The main point of this article intends to introduce the revised Air Pollution Law with two covered area. One is about strengthening the warning system in regulating volatile organic pollutants. The other one mentions reducing the vehicle emissions by raising fuel quality standards. It supported by comparing the current law with the previous one, with additional public concerns and experts’ opinions. 这篇文章主要讲的是新《大气污染防治法》并分为两个主要方面,第一个是加强重污染预警系统,另外一个是通过提高机动车排放标准以减少车辆排放。由比较修改前的法律和专家以及公众的担忧来说明的。
4. What actors (individuals or organizations) are referred to? (Provide names and short descriptions.)
Jiwen Chang: deputy head of the Resources and Environment Policy Institute, part of the State Council's Development Research Centre.
Liansai Dong: Greenpeace’s climate and energy campaigner. He says: “The lack of a cap on coal is another drawback”.
常纪文:国务院发展研究中心资源与环境政策研究所副所长
王金南:环保部环规院副院长兼总工
5. What kind of causation or responsibility is argued or implied in the article?
As part of its war on pollution, China's government is trying to give environmental inspectors stronger powers and more resources to take action against persistent polluters and the local governments that are blamed for protecting them.
The new law has positives and negatives. However, the responsibility for people doesn’t really addressed in this article.
6. How (if at all) are health disparities or other equity issues addressed in the article or report? The article is all about the new Air Pollution Law, Beijing puts more effort than the other local areas. This is the disparity in the action of improving air quality. 全文讲述了新《大气污染防治法》,但在北京的治理力度远远大于其他各地,明显体现了在提高空气质量上各个地区的不同。
7. What three points, details or references from the article did you follow up on to advance your understanding of the issued and actors described in the article?
The legislative process of improving air quality is hard, but China is making effort in protecting the environment through this new Air Pollution Law. Although it may not be perfect.
There are too many ways of polluting the air, the regulation should be revised more than several times. So I think even the current version of Air Pollution Law is relative new, but it still has deficiencies.
The law of air pollution should be implemented instead of just presented on the paper. Just like Jiwen Chang, deputy head of the Resources and Environment Policy Institute, said that the legislation should be enforced through government powers, rather than just expressions of intent. The emphasis on enforcement, absolutely critical in China where edicts are often ignored at local level, is very much a secondary consideration in the new law on air pollution.
China's new Air Pollution Law omits key measures in war on smog
中国颁布新《大气污染防治法》
1. Full citation and link.
Citation: Liu Qin, “China's new Air Pollution Law omits key measures in war on smog,” Chinadialogue, accessed April 09, 2015, doi: chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/ch/8156-China-s-new-Air-Pollution-Law-omits-key-measures-in-war-on-smog
刘琴. 中国颁布新《大气污染防治法》. https://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/ch/8156-China-s-new-Air-Pollution-Law-omits-key-measures-in-war-on-smog . 2015-04-09
2. What two (or more) quotes capture the message of the article?
3. What is the main point of the article, and how is it supported?
The main point of this article intends to introduce the revised Air Pollution Law with two covered area. One is about strengthening the warning system in regulating volatile organic pollutants. The other one mentions reducing the vehicle emissions by raising fuel quality standards. It supported by comparing the current law with the previous one, with additional public concerns and experts’ opinions.
这篇文章主要讲的是新《大气污染防治法》并分为两个主要方面,第一个是加强重污染预警系统,另外一个是通过提高机动车排放标准以减少车辆排放。由比较修改前的法律和专家以及公众的担忧来说明的。
4. What actors (individuals or organizations) are referred to? (Provide names and short descriptions.)
5. What kind of causation or responsibility is argued or implied in the article?
6. How (if at all) are health disparities or other equity issues addressed in the article or report?
The article is all about the new Air Pollution Law, Beijing puts more effort than the other local areas. This is the disparity in the action of improving air quality.
全文讲述了新《大气污染防治法》,但在北京的治理力度远远大于其他各地,明显体现了在提高空气质量上各个地区的不同。
7. What three points, details or references from the article did you follow up on to advance your understanding of the issued and actors described in the article?