2. What two (or more) quotes capture the message of the article?
“Lawsuit filed by Chinese environmental organisation targets the profits made by polluters, rather than focussing on tricky calculations of financial damages from toxic air.”
“The All-China Environmental Federation (ACEF), which brought the lawsuit, is basing the potential amount of damages on an offending company’s operating costs, in the hope this will provide a route to successful public interest litigation.”
“The new environmental protection law, and a judicial interpretation from the Supreme People’s Court on handling of environmental public interest lawsuits, had changed the outlook for such litigation.”
3. What is the main point of the article, and how is it supported? The first case of environmental organization files a 30 million yuan lawsuit for a chemical company. It is supported by the fact reported in the news and the further analysis of Ma Young, deputy head of ACEF’s Environmental Legal Services Center.
中国首例环保组织索赔空气污染化工企业3000万。由新闻报道和中华环保联合会环境法律服务中心副主任马勇的分析解释来论证的。
4. What actors (individuals or organizations) are referred to? (Provide names and short descriptions.)
Dezhou Jinghua: a Shandong chemical company which got a lawsuit requesting compensation for air pollution.
All-China Environmental Federation (ACEF): a nationwide non-profitable civil society organization (CSO) in the field of the environment, and is supported by the government. It is composed of CSOs and individuals who are enthusiastic about and support environmental protection and are willing to work for it.
Ma Yong: deputy head of ACEF’s Environmental Legal Services Center.
Liu Jinmei: Environmental lawyer.
Hu Jing: a deputy professor at the China University of Politics and Law’s Environment and Resources Law Institute.
Beijing News: a Chinese language newspaper in thePeople's Republic of China from Beijing.
Yang Xiumei: head of the Dongying Intermediate People’s Court.
Zhang Boju: secretary-general of Friends of Nature.
Friends of Nature (FON): It is the oldest environmental NGO in China. They have been working for over a decade to promote environmental awareness about China’s most pressing environmental problems.
5. What kind of causation or responsibility is argued or implied in the article?
Causation: Dezhou Jinghua has saved over 20 million yuan by not installing environmental-protection equipment on a number of production lines, and had also avoided fines that should have been paid for pollution. The environmental group has filed a 30 million yuan (US$4.8 million) lawsuit to seek compensation from them.
Responsibility: The environmental lawsuit is rare due to difficulties in gathering evidence and assessing damages. However, the companies’ first priority in development should be protecting the environment especially those industries discharge toxic gas to atmosphere. They should install environmental-protection equipment on a number of production lines.
6. How (if at all) are health disparities or other equity issues addressed in the article or report? The health disparities are not mentioned in the article.
7. What three points, details or references from the article did you follow up on to advance your understanding of the issued and actors described in the article?
The legislative regulation is one aspect of preventing them discharge toxic gas into atmosphere, but this is not the essence of protecting environment. The companies should improve their awareness of protecting environment.
According to the article, more litigations are expected after this case since the implementation of the new environmental protection law. This situation is good for the development in improving air quality.
In the article, we can see more and more people has been attracted by the notorious air situation, including deputy head from NGOs and the head of the Intermediate People’s Court.
Citation: Qin Liu, “China court to hear 30m yuan air pollution lawsuit” Chinadialogue, accessed March 25 2015.
刘琴,环保组织索赔空气污染企业3000万,https://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/ch/7790-China-court-to-hear-3-m-yuan-air-pollution-lawsuit- 2015-03-25
2. What two (or more) quotes capture the message of the article?
3. What is the main point of the article, and how is it supported?
The first case of environmental organization files a 30 million yuan lawsuit for a chemical company. It is supported by the fact reported in the news and the further analysis of Ma Young, deputy head of ACEF’s Environmental Legal Services Center.
中国首例环保组织索赔空气污染化工企业3000万。由新闻报道和中华环保联合会环境法律服务中心副主任马勇的分析解释来论证的。
4. What actors (individuals or organizations) are referred to? (Provide names and short descriptions.)
5. What kind of causation or responsibility is argued or implied in the article?
6. How (if at all) are health disparities or other equity issues addressed in the article or report?
The health disparities are not mentioned in the article.
7. What three points, details or references from the article did you follow up on to advance your understanding of the issued and actors described in the article?