走马铜山看环保”系列——展望篇人文和谐新铜山 (“Cursory Look of Tongshan Environmental Protection” – Outlook Chapter: Human Cultural and Harmonious New Tongshan) Full citation and abstract (include link if exists)
赵耕 黄忠泉洪燕姜楠楠，“走马铜山看环保”系列——展望篇人文和谐新铜山, 2015-10-16
Geng Zhao, Zhongquan Huang, Yan Hong, Nannan Jiang, “Cursory Look of Tongshan Environmental Protection” – Outlook Chapter: Human Cultural and Harmonious New Tongshan, accessed 10/16/2015
What is the main point and the purpose of the article?
The main point of the article is to paint a picture of measurements and actions will be implemented to establish a new tongshan area. The purpose of the article is convince the people in tongshan that successfully completion of the plan designed by government would lead to a cleaner and richer tongshan area.
Does the way the article is written encourage you to take sides on the issue? Explain.
The article encourages me to think environmental problem in Tongshan will be completely resolved if the measurement described take place. It uses the word like “completely solve” and “ensure”, “adhere to” to give me a sense of confidence the government would implement the measurement and successfully solve the issues.
List the sources the author(s) use to support the claims on air pollution (i.e. scientific evidence, expert, government official, citizens, etc.). Provide names and short descriptions.
The article mentions a plan for environmental protection, which includes some emission standards, but the source of the plan is not mentioned. It lists some general measures like “reinforce control of dust in construction site”, “complete desulfurizing mission in coal fire plants”.
What bias did the author bring to the writing of this article?
The author has the bias that the measures that government will implement would only have positive effect on living condition of people in Tongshan area. It fails to evaluate the drawback of those measurements such as possible economic damages if strict air pollution standard implemented.
How (if at all) are health disparities, or other equity issues addressed in the article or report?
No. It hasn’t addressed health disparities.
What three points, details or references from the article did you follow up on to advance your understanding of the issued and actors described in the article?
(“Cursory Look of Tongshan Environmental Protection” – Outlook Chapter: Human Cultural and Harmonious New Tongshan)
Full citation and abstract (include link if exists)
赵耕 黄忠泉洪燕姜楠楠，“走马铜山看环保”系列——展望篇人文和谐新铜山, 2015-10-16
Geng Zhao, Zhongquan Huang, Yan Hong, Nannan Jiang, “Cursory Look of Tongshan Environmental Protection” – Outlook Chapter: Human Cultural and Harmonious New Tongshan, accessed 10/16/2015
What is the main point and the purpose of the article?
The main point of the article is to paint a picture of measurements and actions will be implemented to establish a new tongshan area. The purpose of the article is convince the people in tongshan that successfully completion of the plan designed by government would lead to a cleaner and richer tongshan area.
文章的主要观点是描述为建立一个新的铜山地区而要实行的方法和行动。这篇文章的目的是说服铜山人，成功地完成由政府制定的计划，就会有一个更清洁，更富裕的铜山地区。
Does the way the article is written encourage you to take sides on the issue? Explain.
The article encourages me to think environmental problem in Tongshan will be completely resolved if the measurement described take place. It uses the word like “completely solve” and “ensure”, “adhere to” to give me a sense of confidence the government would implement the measurement and successfully solve the issues.
文章鼓励我认为，如果描述的方案实行的话，在铜山环境问题将得到彻底解决。它采用像“彻底解决”和“保障”，“坚持”让我相信政府将成功地实施方案和解决问题的话。
List the sources the author(s) use to support the claims on air pollution (i.e. scientific evidence, expert, government official, citizens, etc.). Provide names and short descriptions.
The article mentions a plan for environmental protection, which includes some emission standards, but the source of the plan is not mentioned. It lists some general measures like “reinforce control of dust in construction site”, “complete desulfurizing mission in coal fire plants”.
文中提到了铜山“十一五”时期的环保蓝图，其中包括一些排放标准，但该计划的来源没有提及。文章提及了一些像“加强施工现场渣土管理”，“完成境内火力发电厂大气脱硫任务”的普遍措施。
What bias did the author bring to the writing of this article?
The author has the bias that the measures that government will implement would only have positive effect on living condition of people in Tongshan area. It fails to evaluate the drawback of those measurements such as possible economic damages if strict air pollution standard implemented.
笔者有偏见，他认为政府将实施的措施只会对铜山地区人民生活条件有积极的影响。它没有对这些方案的缺点来评价，像可能的经济损失，如果实行严格的空气污染标准的话。
How (if at all) are health disparities, or other equity issues addressed in the article or report?
No. It hasn’t addressed health disparities.
What three points, details or references from the article did you follow up on to advance your understanding of the issued and actors described in the article?